Problem 7-16 Comparing Traditional and Activity-Based Product Margins [LO7-1, LO7-3, LO7-4, LO7-5]
Hi-Tek Manufacturing, Inc., makes two types of industrial component parts—the B300 and the T500. An absorption costing income statement for the most recent period is shown:
| Hi-Tek Manufacturing Inc. Income Statement | |||
| Sales | $ | 1,695,400 | |
| Cost of goods sold | 1,205,309 | ||
| Gross margin | 490,091 | ||
| Selling and administrative expenses | 560,000 | ||
| Net operating loss | $ | (69,909 | ) |
Hi-Tek produced and sold 60,200 units of B300 at a price of $20 per unit and 12,600 units of T500 at a price of $39 per unit. The company’s traditional cost system allocates manufacturing overhead to products using a plantwide overhead rate and direct labor dollars as the allocation base. Additional information relating to the company’s two product lines is shown below:
| B300 | T500 | Total | ||||
| Direct materials | $ | 400,600 | $ | 162,400 | $ | 563,000 |
| Direct labor | $ | 120,100 | $ | 42,100 | 162,200 | |
| Manufacturing overhead | 480,109 | |||||
| Cost of goods sold | $ | 1,205,309 | ||||
The company has created an activity-based costing system to evaluate the profitability of its products. Hi-Tek’s ABC implementation team concluded that $59,000 and $103,000 of the company’s advertising expenses could be directly traced to B300 and T500, respectively. The remainder of the selling and administrative expenses was organization-sustaining in nature. The ABC team also distributed the company’s manufacturing overhead to four activities as shown below:
| Manufacturing Overhead | Activity | |||||
| Activity Cost Pool (and Activity Measure) | B300 | T500 | Total | |||
| Machining (machine-hours) | $ | 203,889 | 90,700 | 62,600 | 153,300 | |
| Setups (setup hours) | 113,820 | 71 | 200 | 271 | ||
| Product-sustaining (number of products) | 101,800 | 1 | 1 | 2 | ||
| Other (organization-sustaining costs) | 60,600 | NA | NA | NA | ||
| Total manufacturing overhead cost | $ | 480,109 | ||||
Required:
1. Compute the product margins for the B300 and T500 under the company’s traditional costing system.
2. Compute the product margins for B300 and T500 under the activity-based costing system.
3. Prepare a quantitative comparison of the traditional and activity-based cost assignments.
Explanation
1.
Under the traditional direct labor-dollar based costing system, manufacturing overhead is applied to products using the predetermined overhead rate computed as follows:
| Predetermined overhead rate | = | Estimated total manufacturing overhead cost | |
| Estimated total direct labor dollars | |||
| = | $480,109 | = $2.96 per DL$ | |
| $162,200 | |||
The product margins using the traditional approach would be computed as follows:
| B300 | T500 | Total | ||||
| Sales | $ | 1,204,000 | $ | 491,400 | $ | 1,695,400 |
| Direct materials | 400,600 | 162,400 | 563,000 | |||
| Direct labor | 120,100 | 42,100 | 162,200 | |||
| Manufacturing overhead applied @ $2.96 per direct labor-dollar | 355,496 | 124,616 | 480,112 | |||
| Total manufacturing cost | 876,196 | 329,116 | 1,205,309 | |||
| Product margin | $ | 327,804 | $ | 162,284 | $ | 490,091 |
Note that all of the manufacturing overhead cost is applied to the products under the company’s traditional costing system.
2.
The first step is to determine the activity rates:
| (a) | (b) | (a) ÷ (b) | ||||||
| Activity Cost Pools | Total Cost | Total Activity | Activity Rate | |||||
| Machining | $ | 203,889 | 153,300 | MH | $ | 1.33 | per MH | |
| Setups | $ | 113,820 | 271 | setup hrs. | $ | 420 | per setup hr. | |
| Product sustaining | $ | 101,800 | 2 | products | $ | 50,900 | per product | |
*The Other activity cost pool is not shown above because it includes organization-sustaining and idle capacity costs that should not be assigned to products.
Under the activity-based costing system, the product margins would be computed as follows:
| B300 | T500 | Total | |||||
| Sales | $ | 1,204,000 | $ | 491,400 | $ | 1,695,400 | |
| Direct materials | 400,600 | 162,400 | 563,000 | ||||
| Direct labor | 120,100 | 42,100 | 162,200 | ||||
| Advertising expense | 59,000 | 103,000 | 162,000 | ||||
| Machining | 120,631 | 83,258 | 203,889 | ||||
| Setups | 29,820 | 84,000 | 113,820 | ||||
| Product sustaining | 50,900 | 50,900 | 101,800 | ||||
| Total cost | 781,051 | 525,658 | 1,306,709 | ||||
| Product margin | $ | 422,949 | $ | (34,258 | ) | $ | 388,691 |
3.
The quantitative comparison is as follows:
| B300 | T500 | |
| Traditional Cost System | ||
| Direct materials | $400,600/$563,000 = 71.2% | $162,400/$563,000 = 28.8% |
| Direct labor | $120,100/$162,200 = 74.0% | $42,100/$162,200 = 26.0% |
| Manufacturing overhead | $355,496/$480,112 = 74.0% | $124,616/$480,112 = 26.0% |
| Activity-Based Costing System | ||
| Direct costs: | ||
| Direct materials | $400,600/$563,000 = 71.2% | $162,400/$563,000 = 28.8% |
| Direct labor | $120,100/$162,200 = 74.0% | $42,100/$162,200 = 26.0% |
| Advertising expense | $59,000/$162,000 = 36.4% | $103,000/$162,000 = 63.6% |
| Indirect costs: | ||
| Machining | $120,631/$203,889 = 59.2% | $83,258/$203,889 = 40.8% |
| Setups | $29,820/$113,820 = 26.2% | $84,000/$113,820 = 73.8% |
| Product sustaining | $50,900/$101,800 = 50.0% | $50,900/$101,800 = 50.0% |
Thanks
No comments:
Post a Comment