Required:
1-a. Calculate the present value for the following assuming that the money can be invested at 12%.
1-b. If she can invest money at 12%, which option would you recommend that she accept?
Explanation
The present value of the first option is $140,000, since the entire amount would be received immediately.
The present value of the second option is:
Annual annuity: $27,000 × 3.605 (Exhibit 13B-2) | $ | 97,335 | |
Lump-sum payment: $59,000 × 0.567 (Exhibit 13B-1) | 33,453 | ||
Total present value | $ | 130,788 | |
Thus, Julie should accept the first option, which has a much higher present value.
On the surface, the second option appears to be a better choice because it promises a total cash inflow of $194,000 over the 5-year period ($27,000 × 5 = $135,000; $135,000 + $59,000 = $194,000), whereas the first option promises a cash inflow of only $140,000. However, the cash inflows under the second option are spread out over 5 years, causing the present value to be far less.
No comments:
Post a Comment