Frank Moran manages the cutting department of Greene Timber Company. He purchased a tree-cutting machine on January 1, year 2, for $200,000. The machine had an estimated useful life of five years and zero salvage value, and the cost to operate it is $45,000 per year. Technological developments resulted in the development of a more advanced machine available for purchase on January 1, year 3, that would allow a 25 percent reduction in operating costs. The new machine would cost $120,000 and have a four-year useful life and zero salvage value. The current market value of the old machine on January 1, year 3, is $100,000, and its book value is $160,000 on that date. Straight-line depreciation is used for both machines. The company expects to generate $112,000 of revenue per year from the use of either machine.
Required
- Recommend whether to replace the old machine on January 1, year 3.
- Prepare income statements for four years (year 3 through year 6) assuming that the old machine is retained.
- Prepare income statements for four years (year 3 through year 6) assuming that the old machine is replaced.
Explanation
a.
The historical cost of the old machine is a sunk cost and therefore is irrelevant. The relevant (avoidable) costs for each alternative are shown below:
The historical cost of the old machine is a sunk cost and therefore is irrelevant. The relevant (avoidable) costs for each alternative are shown below:
Decision | Keep Old | Replace With New | ||||
Opportunity cost of old machine | $ | 100,000 | ||||
Purchase price of the new machine | $ | 120,000 | ||||
Operating expense | 180,000 | 135,000 | ||||
Total avoidable costs | $ | 280,000 | $ | 255,000 | ||
Operating expense of old $45,000 × 4 years = $180,000.
Operating expense of new $180,000 × 0.75 = $135,000.
The analysis suggests that the old machine should be replaced because Greene Timber Company would minimize avoidable cost with this decision.
c.
*$100,000 Market value − $160,000 Book value = $60,000 Loss
Thanks
No comments:
Post a Comment